Coriolis effect demo

Here is an impressive demonstration of the Coriolis effect, which I claim is responsible for—together with the cosmic centrifugal force—the so-called "dark matter."


Comments

  1. Stavros KiriApril 9, 2017 at 12:42 PM


    Great demo! Resembles the Space-Time rotation that you propose, very much too!!
    Once inside you "cannot" tell what the [coriolis] force is, or where it's coming from !! ... and you "call it" "Dark Matter" !! ...
    [Almost similar with "Dark Energy" and the other inertial force ...]

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stavros KiriApril 9, 2017 at 12:43 PM


    Great demo! Resembles the Space-Time rotation that you propose, very much too!!
    Once inside you "cannot" tell what the [coriolis] force is, or where it's coming from !! ... and you "call it" "Dark Matter" !! ...
    [Almost similar with "Dark Energy" and the other inertial force ...]

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dark Energy and Dark Matter are Cosmic Centrifugal and Coriolis Forces

Below is my attempt at explaining the problems of dark energy and dark matter that I developed in 2010. The two most outstanding unsolved problems of modern cosmology today are the problems of dark energy and dark matter. Together these two problems imply that about a whopping 96% of the energy content of the universe is simply unaccounted for within the reigning paradigm of modern cosmology. T he dark energy problem has been around only for about two decades, while the dark matter problem has gone unsolved for about 90 years. Various ideas have been put forward, including some fantastic ones such as the presence of ghostly fields and particles. Some ideas even suggest the breakdown of the standard Newton-Einstein gravity for the relevant scales. Although some progress has been made particularly in the area of dark matter with the nonstandard gravity theories, the problems still stand unresolved.   I n this article, I propose a globally rotating universe (that...
Read more

de Broglie's seminal paper was mostly speculative but got published

"There is of course one final observation to be made: in terms of the present politics of publishing scientific papers, de Broglie's contribution could never have been published because it only essentially contains speculations. However, one can just as well say that this paper proves that speculations are an essential part of physics; without them no new ideas and theories are born. Quantum mechanics has to be regarded as a true rupture in the history of physics, as a revolution in the philosophy of science – a revolution that desperately needed speculations and deviations beyond well-accepted ways of thinking. It pays off to come back occasionally to one of the famous papers in the Philosophical Magazine!" A quote from P. Weinberger: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500830600876565
Read more

What is the Origin of Intrinsic Quantum Spin?

Spin quantum number is the fourth parameter needed to uniquely describe the quantum state of a, say, fermion such as an electron. It was originally postulated by the brilliant, albeit caustic, Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli. Shortly afterwards some physicists interpreted it as self-rotation. Pauli himself was not happy with this interpretation because a quick calculation shows that such a mechanical supposition requires a superluminal rotation of the electron's "surface," which goes counter to the dictates of the special theory of relativity. So how is quantum spin explained then? Is there a physical model for it? The standard answer to these questions is that we are supposed to think of quantum spin as a two-valued intrinsic quantum degree of freedom, corresponding to an "intrinsic" angular momentum, with  no classical analog . And the majority of physicists follow this catechism. But I don't! When self-rotation so neatly explains the two-valuedness...
Read more